随机算法 (Spring 2013) and Fitness: Difference between pages
imported>Etone |
imported>Macdonald-ross mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{otheruse|biological fitness}} | ||
| | '''Fitness''' in [[biology]] is the relative ability of an organism to survive and pass on its [[gene]]s to the next generation.<ref>King R.C. Stansfield W.D. & Mulligan P.K. 2006. ''A dictionary of genetics'', 7th ed. Oxford.</ref><sup>p160</sup> It is a central idea in [[evolution|evolutionary theory]]. Fitness is usually equal to the proportion of the individual's [[gene]]s in all the genes of the next generation. | ||
< | |||
| | |||
| | Like all terms in evolutionary biology, fitness is defined in terms of an interbreeding [[Population genetics|population]], which might or might not be a whole [[species]]. If differences in individual genotypes affect fitness, then the frequencies of the genotypes will change over generations; the genotypes with higher fitness become more common. This is the process called [[natural selection]]. | ||
An individual's fitness is caused by its [[phenotype]], and passed on by its [[genotype]]. The fitnesses of different individuals with the same genotype are not necessarily equal. It depends on the [[environment]] in which the individuals live, and on accidental [[event]]s. However, since the fitness of the genotype is an [[average]]d quantity, it reflects the reproductive outcomes of ''all'' individuals with that genotype. | |||
== Relatedness == | |||
Fitness measures the number of the ''copies'' of the genes of an individual in the next generation. It doesn't really matter how the genes arrive in the next generation. For an individual, it is equally "beneficial" to reproduce itself, or to help relatives with similar genes to reproduce, ''as long as similar number of copies of individual's genes get passed on to the next generation''. Selection which promotes this kind of helper behaviour is called [[kin selection]]. | |||
Our closest relatives (parents, siblings, and our own children) share on average 50% (half) of our genes. One step further removed are grandparents. With each of them we share on average 25% (a quarter) of our genes. That is a measure of our relatedness to them. Next come first cousins (children of our parents' siblings). We share 12.5% (1/8) of their genes.<ref name=JMS>Maynard Smith, John. 1999. ''Evolutionary genetics''. 2nd ed, Cambridge University Press.</ref><sup>p100</sup> | |||
= | === Hamilton's rule === | ||
[[W.D. Hamilton|William Hamilton]] added various ideas to the notion of fitness. His rule suggests that a costly action should be performed if: | |||
:* | :<math>C < R \times B </math> where: | ||
* <math>c \ </math> is the reproductive cost to the altruist, | |||
* <math>b \ </math> is the reproductive benefit to the recipient of the altruistic behavior, and | |||
* <math>r \ </math> is the probability, above the population average, of the individuals sharing an altruistic gene – the "degree of relatedness". | |||
Fitness costs and benefits are measured in [[fecundity]].<ref>Hamilton W.D. 1964. The genetical evolution of social behavior. ''Journal of Theoretical Biology'' '''7''' (1): 1–52. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4.</ref> | |||
= | === Inclusive fitness === | ||
Inclusive fitness is a term which is essentially the same as fitness, but emphasises the group of genes rather than individuals. | |||
Biological fitness says how well an organism can reproduce, and spread its genes to its offspring. The theory of inclusive fitness says that the fitness of an organism is also increased to the extent that its close relatives also reproduce. This is because relatives share genes in proportion to their relationship. | |||
Another way of saying it: ''the inclusive fitness of an organism is not a property of itself, but a property of its set of [[genes]]''. It is calculated from from the reproductive success of the individual, plus the reproductive success of its relatives, each one weighed by an appropriate coefficient of relatedness.<ref>Adapted from Dawkins R. 1982. ''The extended phenotype''. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p186. ISBN 0-19-288051-9</ref> | |||
=== | == History == | ||
The [[British]] [[Sociology|social]] [[philosopher]] [[Herbert Spencer]] coined the phrase ''[[survival of the fittest]]'' in his 1864 work ''Principles of biology'' to mean what [[Charles Darwin]] called [[natural selection]].<ref> Herbert Spencer 1864. ''Principles of Biology'' London, vol 1, 444, wrote “This survival of the fittest, which I have here sought to express in mechanical terms, is that which Mr. Darwin has called ‘natural selection’, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. </ref> The original phrase was "survival of the best fitted". | |||
== | == References == | ||
{{Reflist}} | |||
[[Category:Classical genetics]] | |||
[[Category:Evolutionary biology]] | |||
Latest revision as of 14:26, 23 June 2016
Template:Otheruse Fitness in biology is the relative ability of an organism to survive and pass on its genes to the next generation.[1]p160 It is a central idea in evolutionary theory. Fitness is usually equal to the proportion of the individual's genes in all the genes of the next generation.
Like all terms in evolutionary biology, fitness is defined in terms of an interbreeding population, which might or might not be a whole species. If differences in individual genotypes affect fitness, then the frequencies of the genotypes will change over generations; the genotypes with higher fitness become more common. This is the process called natural selection.
An individual's fitness is caused by its phenotype, and passed on by its genotype. The fitnesses of different individuals with the same genotype are not necessarily equal. It depends on the environment in which the individuals live, and on accidental events. However, since the fitness of the genotype is an averaged quantity, it reflects the reproductive outcomes of all individuals with that genotype.
Relatedness
Fitness measures the number of the copies of the genes of an individual in the next generation. It doesn't really matter how the genes arrive in the next generation. For an individual, it is equally "beneficial" to reproduce itself, or to help relatives with similar genes to reproduce, as long as similar number of copies of individual's genes get passed on to the next generation. Selection which promotes this kind of helper behaviour is called kin selection.
Our closest relatives (parents, siblings, and our own children) share on average 50% (half) of our genes. One step further removed are grandparents. With each of them we share on average 25% (a quarter) of our genes. That is a measure of our relatedness to them. Next come first cousins (children of our parents' siblings). We share 12.5% (1/8) of their genes.[2]p100
Hamilton's rule
William Hamilton added various ideas to the notion of fitness. His rule suggests that a costly action should be performed if:
- [math]\displaystyle{ C \lt R \times B }[/math] where:
- [math]\displaystyle{ c \ }[/math] is the reproductive cost to the altruist,
- [math]\displaystyle{ b \ }[/math] is the reproductive benefit to the recipient of the altruistic behavior, and
- [math]\displaystyle{ r \ }[/math] is the probability, above the population average, of the individuals sharing an altruistic gene – the "degree of relatedness".
Fitness costs and benefits are measured in fecundity.[3]
Inclusive fitness
Inclusive fitness is a term which is essentially the same as fitness, but emphasises the group of genes rather than individuals.
Biological fitness says how well an organism can reproduce, and spread its genes to its offspring. The theory of inclusive fitness says that the fitness of an organism is also increased to the extent that its close relatives also reproduce. This is because relatives share genes in proportion to their relationship.
Another way of saying it: the inclusive fitness of an organism is not a property of itself, but a property of its set of genes. It is calculated from from the reproductive success of the individual, plus the reproductive success of its relatives, each one weighed by an appropriate coefficient of relatedness.[4]
History
The British social philosopher Herbert Spencer coined the phrase survival of the fittest in his 1864 work Principles of biology to mean what Charles Darwin called natural selection.[5] The original phrase was "survival of the best fitted".
References
- ↑ King R.C. Stansfield W.D. & Mulligan P.K. 2006. A dictionary of genetics, 7th ed. Oxford.
- ↑ Maynard Smith, John. 1999. Evolutionary genetics. 2nd ed, Cambridge University Press.
- ↑ Hamilton W.D. 1964. The genetical evolution of social behavior. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7 (1): 1–52. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4.
- ↑ Adapted from Dawkins R. 1982. The extended phenotype. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p186. ISBN 0-19-288051-9
- ↑ Herbert Spencer 1864. Principles of Biology London, vol 1, 444, wrote “This survival of the fittest, which I have here sought to express in mechanical terms, is that which Mr. Darwin has called ‘natural selection’, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life.