Sperner system
| Theorem (Sperner 1928)
|
- Let [math]\displaystyle{ |S|=n }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{F}\subseteq 2^S }[/math] be an antichain. Then
- [math]\displaystyle{ |\mathcal{F}|\le{n\choose \lfloor n/2\rfloor} }[/math].
|
First proof (symmetric chain decomposition)
Proof of Sperner's theorem
- [math]\displaystyle{ \square }[/math]
|
Second proof (shadowing)
| Definition
|
- Let [math]\displaystyle{ |S|=n\, }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{F}\subseteq {S\choose k} }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ k\lt n\, }[/math].
- The shade of [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{F} }[/math] is defined to be
- [math]\displaystyle{ \nabla\mathcal{F}=\left\{A\in {S\choose k+1}\,\,\bigg|\,\, \exists B\in\mathcal{F}\mbox{ such that } B\subset A\right\} }[/math].
- Thus the shade [math]\displaystyle{ \nabla\mathcal{F} }[/math] of [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{F} }[/math] consists of all subsets of [math]\displaystyle{ S }[/math] which can be obtained by adding an element to a set in [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{F} }[/math].
- Similarly, the shadow of [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{F} }[/math] is defined to be
- [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta\mathcal{F}=\left\{A\in {S\choose k-1}\,\,\bigg|\,\, \exists B\in\mathcal{F}\mbox{ such that } A\subset B\right\} }[/math].
- Thus the shadow [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta\mathcal{F} }[/math] of [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{F} }[/math] consists of all subsets of [math]\displaystyle{ S }[/math] which can be obtained by removing an element from a set in [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{F} }[/math].
|
| Lemma (Sperner)
|
- Let [math]\displaystyle{ |S|=n\, }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{F}\subseteq {S\choose k} }[/math]. Then
- [math]\displaystyle{
\begin{align}
&|\nabla\mathcal{F}|\ge\frac{n-k}{k+1}|\mathcal{F}| &\text{ if } k\lt n\\
&|\Delta\mathcal{F}|\ge\frac{k}{n-k+1}|\mathcal{F}| &\text{ if } k\gt 0.
\end{align}
}[/math]
|
Proof of Sperner's theorem
| (original proof of Sperner)
|
- [math]\displaystyle{ \square }[/math]
|
Third proof (double counting)
Proof of Sperner's theorem
- [math]\displaystyle{ \square }[/math]
|
The LYM inequality
| Theorem (Lubell, Yamamoto 1954; Meschalkin 1963)
|
- Let [math]\displaystyle{ |S|=n }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{F}\subseteq 2^S }[/math] be an antichain. For [math]\displaystyle{ k=0,1,\ldots,n }[/math], let [math]\displaystyle{ f_k=|\{A\in\mathcal{F}\mid |A|=k\}| }[/math]. Then
- [math]\displaystyle{ \sum_{A\in\mathcal{F}}\frac{1}{{n\choose |A|}}=\sum_{k=0}^n\frac{f_k}{{n\choose k}}\le 1 }[/math].
|
Another proof (the probabilistic method)
- [math]\displaystyle{ \square }[/math]
|
| Proposition
|
- [math]\displaystyle{ \sum_{A\in\mathcal{F}}\frac{1}{{n\choose |A|}}\le 1 }[/math] implies that [math]\displaystyle{ |\mathcal{F}|\le{n\choose \lfloor n/2\rfloor} }[/math].
|
Sunflowers
Erdős–Ko–Rado theorem
Helly-type theorems
Kruskal–Katona theorem